Frankly speakingheitzman? who the heck is heitzman?A closer look at Oak Park's johnny-on-the-spot architectural preservationistBy BRETT McNEILEditor
Is Frank Heitzman the most opinionated man in Oak Park? In a town as finicky and fussy as ours, that's a debatable point. But there's no denying Heitzman, a local architect, a key member of the St. Edmund Preservation Society and one of the founding fathers of the Oak Park Architectural League (OPAL), is among the village's busiest tastemakers and aesthetes. In the last year, he's found himself at the center-some might say insinuated himself into the center-of the debates over proposed renovations at St. Edmund, and, through OPAL, over the designs of the new Emerson and Julian middle schools. More recently, Heitzman and OPAL entered the fray over Oak Park Hospital's plan to build a new medical office building on its south Oak Park property, urging developers to consider ways to orient the hospital project toward Harlem Avenue. While OPAL and Heitzman received their public and political baptism a few years back in lobbying for changes in the Taxman Corporation's retail development at Lake and Harlem, their shared vision of Oak Park as an architecturally and historically significant town worth preserving means they'll continue to be butting in whenever somebody plans to erect a new public building or tear down an old one somewhere in Oak Park. With the hospital having last week received the go-ahead from the village council, with the District 97 school board having approved plans to move forward with their middles schools as designed, and with St. Edmund's poised to proceed with renovations to the church's chapel space, Heitzman is looking toward tomorrow's preservation skirmishes. And topping his list, right now, is a tentative plan at Oak Park and River Forest High School to replace the 1920s football stadium with a new, and decidedly less stately, home of Huskie football. But that's down the road a piece. So just
who the heck is Frank Heitzman and wherever is he coming from? And
just how did a downstate native, whose grandfather owned the local newspaper
and whose dad was the local postmaster, come to be the voice of Oak Park's
past and the jostling advocate for it's future?
An 'ideal' small townHeitzman moved to Oak Park from Chicago in the early 1970s to take advantage of what was, at that time, "inexpensive housing."It didn't hurt, either, that Oak Park has long been famous as ground zero for the Prairie School of American architecture. Like other local architects, Heitzman liked the idea of living down the street from Frank Lloyd Wright's home and studio and of striding the same streets the great man once strode or down which he once tooled in his "Cherokee red" roadsters. But what's kept Heitzman and his family in Oak Park is the small town feel of the village and its historic housing stock. And it's this sense of small town America, a place with a "viable downtown" and "sidewalks you can walk on" that currently guides Heitzman's efforts as one of Oak Park's chief preservationists. "What guides my sense of what Oak Park is is the idea of the traditional small town," Heitzman said. "I think Oak Park is everybody's ideal of what a small town should be." For one, Andres Duany, the father of architecture's "New Urbanism" school, agrees and has based a number of his designs for ground-up housing and commercial developments on an Oak Park-type model. As Heitzman and his fellow OPAL members are fond of saying, "This is Oak Park, not Schaumburg." But as communities throughout the nation, including those in the Chicago area, look toward their futures, increasingly they are trying to build what we've already got. "Even Schaumburg is trying to be like Oak Park," Heitzman said, of that town's efforts to invent a downtown. But while so many others are looking toward Oak Park as a model of future development, Heitzman said he sees a serious challenge to Oak Park's architectural legacy in local attitudes that value new over old. In particular, Heitzman singled out the position of the District 97 school board on their plans to build the new Emerson and Julian buildings. "It's an attitude expressed by [District 97 school board member] Ann Courter at the last board meeting," Heitzman said. "She said, 'We don't want schools that are antiquated,' and I think what she meant by that, and we hear this all the time, is that, 'We don't want old; we want new things.' That's a constant challenge for people who really like old things." And Heitzman counts himself proudly among those who really like old things. "I've
spent my career making old buildings usable," he said.
Old vs. newHeitzman's efforts to preserve Oak Park's old buildings, and to ensure new buildings are designed with a nod toward those that have gone before, has led him into some very public debates over new and old buildings, alike. Leading efforts to head off planned renovations at St. Edmund, Heitzman, a parishioner at the Oak Park Avenue church, sought to have the village declare the building a local landmark. While those efforts have so far proven unsuccessful-and St. Edmund's Pastor Joseph Ruiz was unavailable for comment on this story-Heitzman continues to see the church debate as similar to the one over the quality of the new middle school buildings."The old over new argument is pretty prevalent," Heitzman said. "It's the same attitude Father Ruiz has, that [the St. Edmund sanctuary] is just an old church that needs to be fixed up. There's really an non-appreciation for preservation." But at least one recipient of Heitzman's criticism and architectural suggestions disagrees. District 97 superintendent John Fagan said he and the district's middle school design committee (both have drawn heat from Heitzman and OPAL) have not been blind to Oak Park's tradition of architectural excellence. "I think we have been doing a lot of good thinking," Fagan said of the middle school designs. "OPAL worries about the same thing we do: scale. How will these buildings fit in their neighborhoods? We've spent time with the Historical Society and asked would they fit?" Fagan said he and the rest of the District 97 staff have been attentive to the suggestions offered by OPAL members but received most of the criticisms too far along in the building process to incorporate them all into the new buildings. "The only drawback," Fagan said about suggestions made by Heitzman and OPAL, "is that they came late in the process, at the later stages in the design." And if there's another drawback to the criticism, Fagan said, it's in the way some of the comments have been directed toward board members. "When people have strong opinions about what you're trying to do, sometimes their tone may chase you off at first," he said. "We've tried to stay very positive. I don't think Frank always starts off positive-his first letter to us was pretty critical-but I don't think things have been too bad." Asked
if he thought Heitzman was meddlesome or that he and OPAL were piling on
at a time the district is facing criticism from many quarters on the middle
school plan, Fagan said, "I don't think we've been treated any more harshly
than anybody else; I remember the Taxman deal; it's the same with Oak Park
Hospital; it's the same way everybody has been treated."
No vigilance equals currency exchangesWhile Fagan and perhaps others on the receiving end of Heitzman's comments may smart now and again, Heitzman earns high marks from Oak Parker and Sun-Times architecture critic Lee Bey."Architects usually don't want to ruffle feathers, politically," Bey said. "It can cost them lost commissions. But I like the fact that Frank is willing to jump into the fray. Activism is good and can bring good." Bey said there is a strong legacy of activism among Chicago-based architects, noting Harry Weese, who designed Oak Park's village hall, made a career of slinging arrows and cajoling for preservation efforts. "Oak Park's stock in trade is its housing stock," Bey said, "and the moment you stop being vigilant, you get currency exchanges." Bey, who earlier this year moderated an OPAL forum on the middle school plans, said he thinks Oak Park "is at great risk of losing the things that make it special; we need guys to beat the drum." Of Heitzman, he said, "We need 12 more like him, if you ask me." Lest he and OPAL be cast as malcontents or renegade grousers, however, Heitzman said the group is currently planning to create an award they will give out to local builders and architects who have, or plan to, contribute to Oak Park's architectural tapestry. While the details are as yet unfinished, Heitzman said the plan is to have OPAL members travel around town and make nominations for the award-there will be no lobbying from would-be recipients-and then to recognize the efforts of those who've done something positive for the future of architecture in the village. "I think
we've gotten a bad reputation for always criticizing," Heitzman said. "But
we're trying to be helpful; we want to show aesthetics are extremely important,
that function and beauty should go hand in hand."
|
COMMUNITY COMMENTS:
Talk Back! Respond to this article webmaster@wjinc.com |
||
Wednesday Journal Home Page |