ENGLISH PATTERNS OF EXPANSION

w   ENGLISH COMMERCIALIZATION AFTER 1550

   BARRIERS

   POLITICAL/RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSIES

   ECONOMIC CHANGES (END OF FEUDALISM)

   SHIFT OF POLITICAL POWER FROM LOCALITIES TOWARD CENTRALIZATION

   HENRY VII
   ELIZABETH I

ENGLISH PATTERNS OF EXPANSION

    BARRIERS CONT’D

    LACK OF VENTURE CAPITAL

    INSUFFICIENT “DEEP OCEAN” KNOWLEDGE

   RUTTERS
   CURRENTS
   WINDS

    LARGE PART OF WORLD MARKETS CONTROLLED BY OTHERS

   ITALIANS
   SPANISH
   PORTUGUESE
   DUTCH

    WESTERN ROUTES BLOCKED BY N&S AMERICAN CONTINENTS (SPAIN & PORTUGAL)

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   BARRIERS CONT’D

   VENETIAN MERCHANTS’ CONTROL

   HANSEATIC LEAGUE NEAR MONOPOLY

w   CHANGES

   VENETIAN START TO LOOSE POWER

   ELIZABETH I EXPELS HANSEATIC LEAGUE 1597

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    CHANGES CONT’D

    MERCHANT COMPANIES

    ORGANIZATIONS OF LOCAL PRIVATE TRADERS

    INCORPORATED BODIES (AS A RULE)

    CHARTERED BY CROWN

    “DURING THE YEARS 1555-1698 WHEN THE COMPANY WAS THE PREVAILING FORM OF ORGANIZED ENTERPRISE, THESE BODIES CONTROLLED EVERY VARIETY OF PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS UNDERTAKING DOMESTIC, FOREIGN AND COLONIAL AND THERE WAS SCARCELY AN INDUSTRY OR PART OF THE WORLD IN WHICH THEY WERE NOT ACTIVE.”

 

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   FIVE GREAT COMPANIES BEFORE 1606

   MERCHANT ADVENTURERS OF LONDON, ANTWERP&BRUGGES

   MOSCOVY COMPANY 1555 (RUSSIA)

   EASTLAND COMPANY 1579 (BALTIC)

   LEVANT COMPANY 1581 (PALESTINE)

   East India Company 1579 (INDIA)

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGE (EAST INDIA)

   RIGHT TO ACQUIRE TERRITORY

   CONTRACT ALLIANCES

   CONTROL TROOPS

   COIN MONEY

   DECLARE WAR/MAKE PEACE

ENGLISH PATTERNS OF EXPANSION

w   INDIVIDUALS

   MERCHANTS

   TENDED TO BELONG TO MORE THAN ONE COMPANY

   SIR THOMAS SMITH

   GOVERNOR OF THREE COMPANIES

   LEADING PROMOTER

   VIRGINIA COMPANY
   BERMUDA COMPANY

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   COMPANY ORGANIZATION

w   FOUR PLANS

   REGULATED COMPANY

   PARTNERSHIP

   INVESTED PARTNERS RECEIVE PATENT/MONOPOLY-SPLIT PROFITS

   SEMI-JOINT STOCK

   NO PERMANENT JOINT STOCK

   NEW FOR EACH VENTURE

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   COMPANY ORGANIZATION CONT’D

   ALL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS

   UNINCORPORATED

   NO LEGAL STANDING

COLONIES AND COMPANIES

    THESE COMPANIES WERE PRIVATE CONCERNS, STANDING FOR MASSED AND REGULATED CAPITOL, BUT LICENSED AND PROTECTED BY THE CROWN, NOT BECAUSE THEY EMBODIED ANY CLEAR-CUT DELIBERATE GOVERNMENTAL POLICY, BUT BECAUSE THEY WERE INSTRUMENTS THE STATE COULD USE IN WIDENING THE AREA OF ITS POLITICAL INFLUENCE OF THAT STATE, IN HELPING TO FILL THE ROYAL TREASURIES AND IN AIDING THE SOLUTION OF MANY DIPLOMATIC, ADMINISTRATIVE AND FISCAL PROBLEMS

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    COMPANIES

    OLD WORLD

    SPAIN PORTUGAL TOO STRONG UNTIL 1600’S

w    PRIVATEERING

    WAR WITH SPAIN

    SORT OF A COTTAGE INDUSTRY

    PROMINENT MEN INVOLVED

    GEORGE CLIFFORD, EARL OF CUMBERLAND

   NINE PRIVATEERING VOYAGES TO CARIBBEAN

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    1604-PEACE WITH SPAIN-JAMES I

    ENDED NEED FOR PRIVATEERS

    ENERGY INTO LEGITIMATE MERCHANT ENTERPRISES

    MANY PRIVATEERS MERELY CHANGE FLAGS AND CONTINUE

    CROWN HAD  LITTLE INTEREST IN PRIVATEERS OR FOREIGN TRADE

    PRIVY COUNCIL VERY INTERESTED

    MEMBERS OF TRADE COMPANIES

    KING’S VOICE IN FOREIGN TRADE

PATTERNS IN ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   THE ENGLISH STYLE

   COLONIZATION

   LITTLE EVIDENCE OF “MERCANTILE” PATTERN

   WHAT DOES COLONIZATION MEAN

   WHERE DO THE PEOPLE COME FROM?

   WHAT IS THE INCENTIVE TO LEAVE?

   DID ANYONE WANT TO GO?

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   AS OF THE PEACE WITH SPAIN (1604)

   NO PERMANENT ENGLISH COLONY IN NEW WORLD

   BY 1700 THERE WERE TWENTY ON THE EASTERN SHORE OF N. AMERICA ALONE

   WHY?

   HOW?

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    WHY

    WHY LEAVE DEAR OLDE MOTHER ENGLAND?

    LAND

   TECHNICALLY  ALL LAND “OWNED” BY MONARCH
   ALL LAND OWNERS ARE SO BY MONARCH’S SUFFERANCE
   WHEN LAND OWNER IS LAX TENANTS TAKE ADVANTAGE
   CREATE “COMMON LAND”
    TILLING
    DWELLING
    HUNTING
    ETC.

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    1660 WOOL 2/3 ENGLISH FOREIGN TRADE

    BOOM IN WOOL TRADE

    LARGER HERDS

    MORE PASTURAGE NEEDED

    COMMON LANDS “ENCLOSED”

   EXCLUSIVE USE OF LANDLORD

    MARSHES (FENS) DRAINED

    SQUATTERS DISPOSSESSED

    TENANTS’ RENTS RAISED

w    MINING, FORESTRY AND OTHER INDUSTRIES

PATTERNS IN ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    EFFECTS

    MANY BECOME “MASTERIES”

    LOOSENED TRADITIONAL TIE OF YEOMAN AND LAND

    ELIZABETH I’S REIGN “DISTRESSED BY A MONSTROUS SWARM” OF BEGGARS AND CRIMINALS AND URBAN POOR CAUSED BY A DISPLACED RURAL POPULATION

w    WHAT TO DO

    GO TO THE NEW WORLD

    200 ACRES IN VIRGINIA 12-22S

    GETTING THERE WAS A PROBLEM AND AN EXPENSE

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   COLONIES OFFERED GOVERNMENT SOLUTION

   DEPORTATION

   APPEARS VERY EARLY AS A REMEDY

   CATEGORIES

   VAGRANTS

   CRIMINALS

   UNDESIRABLE SOLDIERS

   THOSE UNDER DEATH SENTENCE

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   COLONIES OFFER RELIGIOUS AN OUTLET

w   THE PERSECUTED

   DISSENTERS

   “PURITANS”

   “QUAKERS”

   CATHOLICS

   OTHERS

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   THOSE SEEKING A PLACE WHERE THE “GODLY” COULD LIVE IN OWN SOCIETY

w   MANY REASONS EVEN THE “PILGRIMS” WERE A MINORITY IN THEIR COLONY

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   ENGLISH PATTERN UNPRECEDENTED

   NO OTHER COUNTRY TRANSPORTED FAMILIES

   FOREIGN MOTIVATIONS LARGELY ABSENT

   QUICK MONEY

   SLAVES

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   PATTERN’S ANTECEDENTS

   PLANTATION OF IRELAND

   HENRY

   ELIZABETH

   JAMES

   ULSTER CROWN PROPERTY FROM 1607

   “ESCHEATMENT” OF “RECUSANT” IRISH PEERS

   MERCANTILISM

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES SUMMATION

    IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION LARGELY OVERLOOKED

    SPAIN-GREAT SPECIE WEALTH STAGNATED

    HOLLAND/ENGLAND FLOURISHED

    PARTNERSHIP vs JOINT-STOCK

    PARTNERSHIP-ALL OR NOTHING

    JOINT-STOCK-ONLY THAT WHICH IS RISKED CAN BE LOST

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w    A SYSTEM TIED TO EARLY MODERN EUROPEAN STATE

w    THE STATE IN CONTEXT

    THE STATE…IN THE PROCESS OF FORMATION WAS NOT THE NATIONAL STATE OF TODAY, WITH ITS FREEDOM OF TRADE UNDER PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS…THE STATE OF THE 17TH CENTURY WAS, IN A SENSE, AN ENLARGED MUNICIPALITY, SELF SUFFICING AND EXCLUSIVE PROTECTING ITSELF FROM THE OUTER WORLD, CONSERVING ALL ITS RESOURCES FOR ITS OWN ADVANTAGE, AND JEALOUS OF OTHER STATES.  

ENGLISH PATTERN OF EXPANSION

w    17TH CENTURY STATE AND MERCANTILISM

    INFLUENCE ON TRADE POLICY OF POWERFUL INDIVIDUALS GREAT

w    ENGLAND’S “COMMERCIAL POLICY”

    SLOW IN MAKING

    NEVER EXACT OF EXACT DEFINITION

    UNDERSTOOD ONLY BY STUDY OF IT IN ACTION OVER 150 YEARS

    RELATION TO COLONIES IN AMERICA

    NEVER EXACT OR UNIFORM

    EXCEPT IN FEW FUNDAMENTALS

PATTERNS OF ENGLISH EXPANSION

w   ENGLISH “COMMERCIAL POLICY”

   MODUS OPERENDI FOR PURPOSE OF MEETING NEEDS OF EXPANDING STATE

   FOLLOWED RATHER THAN DIRECTED COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE

   CHANGED TO MEET STATE’S GROWING STATUS/POWER

   NOT A THEORY-A CONDITION