PERHAPS BEST ARTICULATED IN ITS EARLIEST EXPRESSION

KENTUCKY RESOLUTION 1799

RESPONSE TO “ALIEN/SEDITION” ACTS 1798

DURING TIME OF WAR: ALL CITIZENS OF HOSTILE GOVERNMENT IN THE U.S. ARE “LIABLE TO BE APPREHENDED,  RESTRAINED, SECURED AND REMOVED…” FROM THE U.S.

“…ANY PERSONS SHALL UNLAWFULLY…CONSPIRE WITH INTENT TO OPPOSE ANY MEASURE OF THE GOVERNMENT…SHALL BE PUNISHED…”

 

JEFFERSONIANS FELT SINGLED OUT

HELD CONVENTIONS IN VIRGINIA AND KENTUCKY

COMPOSED VIRGINIA/KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS

MANIFESTOS OF “STATES RIGHTS”

 

KENTUCKY RESOLUTION

ATTACHMENT TO THE UNION

IF FEDERAL ADMINISTRATORS ALOWED TO “TRANSGRESS” THE CONSTITUTION-STATES FACE “ANNIHILATION”

STATES ARE “INDEPENDENT” AND “SOVERIEGN”

FED ADMINSTERS THE GOV’T-NOT THE CONSTITUTION

CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION RESIDES WITH THE STATES

 

“PROGRESS” OF STATES’ RIGHTS

KENTUCKY/VIRGINIA RESOLUTIONS 1799

“ALIEN/SEDITION” ACTS 1798

HARTFORD CONVENTION 1815

LOUISIANA PURCHASE 1803

EMBARGO ACT 1807

OTHER “NONINTERCOURSE” LEGISLATION

WAR AGAINST GB

MCCOLLOUGH V MARYLAND

CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL BANK

 

GEORGIA DEFIANCE

JURSISDICTION OVER INDIAN TRIBES W/IN THE STATE

NULLIFICATION CRISIS 1832

TARIFF OF 1816 AND OTHER PROTECTIVE LAWS

WISCONSIN RESOLUTIONS 1859

SUPREME COURT UPHELD ABOLITIONIST CONVICTION

 

NULLIFICATION

EXTENSION OF THE STATES’ RIGHTS ARGUMENT

STATES HAD THE RIGHT TO NULLIFY FEDERAL LAWS DEEMED INJURIOUS OR UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY LEGISLATURE

NULLIFICATION CRISIS OF 1832

Nullification Crisis

Origins in Tariff of 1816

1820 clear sectional division

North-pro protectionism

South-anti protectionism

Republican party splits

Democratic

National Republican (Whig)

Nullification Crisis

1824

Revision strengthening tariff passes by small minority

Plantation states set against tariff

1828

New revision of tariff

Fight becomes bitter

Growth of manufacturing (North) gives pro-tariff forces more clout

Nullification Crisis

“Free traders”

Frustrated in Congress

Forward idea that individual states have right to “nullify” laws adverse to their interests

South Carolina

Nullification finds its most ardent supporters

S.C. congressmen wanted nullification amended to 1828 tariff bill

Nullification Crisis

Hayne/Webster Debates

1830

Public lands

Protective tariffs

“American system”

Nationalism

National internal improvements

Diversified economy

Protective tariff

National bank

Nullification Crisis

Daniel Webster

Nationalist

New England

Manufacturing

Senator Mass.

Nullification Crisis

John C. Calhoun/Robert Hayne

Southern states

Plantation system

States Rights

Senators  S.C. (Calhoun V.P., Hayne later Gov. S.C.)

Nullification Crisis

S.C. Convention November 1832

“…whereas the said Congress, exceeding its just power to impose taxes and collect revenue for the purpose of effecting and accomplishing the specific objects and purposes which the constitution of the United States authorizes it to effect and accomplish, hath raised and collected unnecessary revenue for objects unauthorized by the constitution.”

Nullification Crisis

“We, therefore, the people of the State of South Carolina, in convention assembled, do declare and ordain and it is hereby declared and ordained…”

Tariff act of 1828

Tariff act of 1832

Were null and void (as far as the government of S.C. was concerned and…

“we are determined to maintain this our ordinance and declaration, at every hazard.”

 

Nullification Crisis

President Jackson

In “vigilant repose”

Confidential orders sent to Army/Navy

Trusted officers to key posts

Arms and Ammo pre-positioned

Nullification Crisis

Presidential Proclamation 11 December 1832

“Force bill” introduced in congress

Compromise worked by Henry Clay reducing the tariff

Compromise averts collision

Nullification achieved the desired end

Could not be used again

Secession is the only route left

Nullification Crisis

Henry Clay

“Westerner”

Kentucky

“Great Compromiser”

Senator, Congressman, Speaker of the House

Nullification Crisis

Not the first time secession threatened

Hartford Convention

15 Dec. 1815-4 Jan. 1815

Hartford Ct.

Federalists

War of 1812 “Mr. Madison’s War”

Contemplated separate peace between New England and England

Proposal to secede (discussed but rejected)

Proposed Constitutional amendments